Spelling tame (PR #12812)

This is split from #12779

GitHub

One conflict isn’t bad…

As noted in Spelling by jsoref · Pull Request #12779 · discourse/discourse · GitHub

I understand that this word is being removed in places – a disadvantage of typos is that they mean words can hide from such fixes. (I ran into a merge conflict which forced me to drop some other change in this family.)

Spelling by jsoref · Pull Request #12779 · discourse/discourse · GitHub (:+1: )

Spelling by jsoref · Pull Request #12779 · discourse/discourse · GitHub (:+1:)

This is a brand and this specific instance is user facing.

Spelling by jsoref · Pull Request #12779 · discourse/discourse · GitHub (:+1:)

Spelling by jsoref · Pull Request #12779 · discourse/discourse · GitHub (:+1:)

spec/services/search_indexer_spec.rb (:+1:)

?

This is a brand and this specific instance is user facing (specifically it shows up in the PR I just made).

I skipped the class flavors since I’m not sure if changing them would be problematic.

probably?

I’m assuming that these usernames aren’t particularly important. I’m happy to drop any changes.

For the most part, I’ve actually skipped usernames…

ibid

-ditribution
+distribution

?

https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12779#discussion_r617136938 ?

I’m generally not enforcing en-US v en-GB in this PR, however in cases where one flavor or the other is strongly dominant, I have sometimes made changes

ditto